The World Health Organization (WHO) defines social determinants of health as “conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age.” In a previous post on the topic, Rick Ybarra, Program Officer for the Hogg Foundation, wrote:
“They include factors like socioeconomic status, education, the physical environment, employment, and social support networks, as well as access to healthcare. Typically, issues that go well beyond the scope of the traditional health care encounter between provider and client.”
The same can be said for the social determinants of mental health. In fact, health and mental health determinants tend to be interdependent. For example, you can’t expect a community’s health to improve if its mental health doesn’t, or vice versa.
Here are three things to know about social determinants of health and mental health:
1. Social determinants have complex impacts on health and mental health. People experience better outcomes when providers—and community leaders—use social determinant interventions.
Making sense of the connections between social determinants and individual mental health isn’t always easy. Factors like education, economic stability, social connection, neighborhood and community context, built infrastructure, and access to healthcare all impact a person’s well-being. So how do you know which determinants are at play, and what can you do to address them?
Luckily, a number of theoretical approaches have been developed for mental health providers who want to strengthen patient outcomes. Take a look, also, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Tools for Putting Social Determinants of Health into Action. At the Hogg Foundation, social determinants of mental health have long been a driver of our grantmaking. Last year, we awarded $1 million in grants to two medical schools and a nonprofit organization to help them use a social determinants approach to advance their integrated healthcare programs.
But what if you’re not a mental health provider? We can all address social determinants. Take, for example, the Hogg Foundation’s Faith-Based Education and Awareness initiative. It’s based on a mutual recognition—between grantmaker and grantee partner—that faith institutions are not just sites of spiritual development, but caregiving and community-building centers as well. Doing away with the assumption that institutional spaces exist only to perform a single function opens us up to the idea that the places where people live, learn, work, play, and pray can support a person’s well-being, especially with the help of collaborative interventions.
2. Protective factors are as important to consider as risk factors.
The spectrum of social determinants of mental health isn’t limited to risk factors, which are more likely to lead to negative outcomes (e.g. poverty, community violence, substance use). Protective factors, which are more likely to lead to positive outcomes (e.g. supportive relationships, community safety, high self-esteem), are just as important to understand. Some factors are fixed (e.g. biological), while others can change over time (e.g. income level).
To be effective, prevention tactics must tackle both sides of the coin and address risk and protective factors in multiple contexts, including relationships and communities. It’s important to bring an understanding of the contexts in which a child operates. What are the conditions at home, in his/her neighborhood, and in the broader community, and how can the activities of the intervention influence one or more social determinant in his/her life (e.g. peer network, education level, access to quality healthcare)?
At God’s Way Christian Baptist Church, youth-oriented activities are as focused on facilitating conversations about personal struggles as encouraging a healthy development of self-esteem. This is because their wellness ministry leaders see both as critical to learning about the repercussions of mental health stigma and building a better health future for its congregants.
3. The impact of a social determinant might not be immediate, but reveal itself over time or in crisis.
Just because the impact of a given social determinant isn’t immediately felt or measurable doesn’t mean it’s not significant. The factors that contribute to prevalence of a chronic disease can take decades to surface—a time lag that’s difficult to study, but critical to our ability to address them over time. The evidence of social determinants becomes obvious once we’re equipped to recognize it, and crisis makes it all the more visible.
In an Into the Fold podcast episode on community resilience, Lourdes Rodriguez, director of the Center for Place-Based Initiatives at The University of Texas at Austin’s Dell Medical School, said disasters like Hurricane Harvey bring a “magnifying glass” to a community’s “tender points,” or the social determinants that make some more vulnerable than others. Harvey’s impact on mental health, like that of Hurricane Katrina, will continue to play out for years to come, particularly for residents with low income.
Factors like social norms, neighborhood makeup, and language barriers also function as social determinants of mental health, and it’s true that moments of crisis cast a harsh light on these conditions. In their aftermath, however, there exists a real opportunity to create solidarity and resilience—and, through preventive strategies and services, enrich community life and thus, the health and mental health of community members.
Related Content
3 Things to Know: Cultural Humility
What might it mean to practice “cultural humility,” a phrase often seen in areas related to mental health care and social advocacy?
Three Things to Know About Meeting with Policymakers
From the Robert Lee Sutherland Seminar Policy Pre-seminar, here are three things to know about meeting with policymakers.
3 Things to Know: Allostatic Load
The toll that chronic exposure to stressful experiences takes on the body is known as the “allostatic load” — and it’s the subject of our latest “3 Things to Know” blog series.



